- #Photoninja user review manual
- #Photoninja user review pro
- #Photoninja user review iso
- #Photoninja user review free
#Photoninja user review iso
Excellent noise reduction tools as well, although I wish Photo Ninja retained more of the old Noise Ninja interface that I was accustomed to for finessing tricky high ISO files. I haven't personally tried Photo Ninja with X-Trans Fuji RAFs but other experienced photographers vouch for it. If you don't need the advantages of Lightroom's organizing tools and interface with some good non-Adobe editing tools, Photo Ninja is a good raw processor that works very well with Fuji X-A1 raw (RAF) files. Preferences for user interfaces are a highly personal thing, and Lightroom's UI isn't for all of us.
And nonetheless, I think it is worth having a look at other options as well. It really is worth its money and worth considering. One of Lightroom's largest advantages, though, is a large community and user-base there are a lot more books on it, more sites, more tutorials, more plug-ins and so on. Check effectiveness of things are shadow and highlight recovery, noise reduction. All of them can pull great quality out of your raw files, use your normal own images to see how much effort you need to get the results you prefer.
#Photoninja user review manual
Another rather unknown but apparently quite well-rounded program worth looking into is Cyberlink PhotoDirector 5 from review it seems to have grown to be a quite competent Lightroom-clone.Įvaluating a trial - personally I would try one at a time, and use the program read the manual a bit to see how it works, and see if it fits your way of working. Personally, it adds nothing I actually need, so I am fine with the cheaper version, but this again is something you'd need to evaluate for yourself.
#Photoninja user review pro
The Pro version offers a similar level of functions as Lightroom (local edits, keystone correction etc.), but costs quite a bit more. It does everything that Ellis listed above, in fact. The user interface is something you should try for yourself, some cannot get along with it, some can (I can - this is my program of choice). Its catalog functions are at best functional, but not as seamless integrated as in Lightroom. Express is slightly cheaper than Lightroom, has a little less editing options, delivers very high quality conversions. CaptureOne exists in two versions: Express and Pro. AfterShot is the heir to Bibble Pro, in its day a very good option, but under Corel's wing it seems to fall behind a bit. DxO and PhotoNinja are also "dedicated" to doing raw conversions, and both are known to have very high quality conversions (note: I've used these programs too little to have a solid opinion). Other paid options are Corel AfterShot, DxO Optics Pro, Photo Ninja and CaptureOne.
#Photoninja user review free
Problem of most free programs is that User Interfaces are a quite "acquired" taste. Its output quaity is something you should really test for yourself, some like it, some do not. It does raw conversions (only), no catalog or similar. There are free alternatives, the best known and most rounded probably being RawTherapee. It is certainly worth exploring the other options personally, I have given Lightroom a try several times and I just cannot settle down on its User Interface - I simply do not like using it. Yes, Lightroom is one of the best options, and offers a considerable depth, but it's not the only option nor the best at everything. There are plenty alternatives, in reality. There really is nothing in the marketplace quite like Lightroom.Sorry, but this is a totally uninformed statement.
0 kommentar(er)
